होमAsian CricketPakistan's Power Tariff Market: The Rs27.309/Unit Figure Is a Scorecard, Not a Final Score

Pakistan's Power Tariff Market: The Rs27.309/Unit Figure Is a Scorecard, Not a Final Score

**मुख्य उत्तर**: पाकिस्तान के नेशनल इलेक्ट्रिक पावर रेगुलेटरी अथॉरिटी (नेपरा) की सुनवाई में सेंट्रल पावर परचेज एजेंसी-गारंटी (सीपीपीए-जी) ने सीवाई2027 के लिए औसत पावर परचेज प्राइस का बेस केस 27.309 रुपये प्रति यूनिट आंका, जो अभी अंतिम उपभोक्ता टैरिफ नहीं है। **प्रमुख तथ्य**: - सीपीपीए-जी ने सीवाई2027 के लिए छह सिनेरियो पेश किए, जिसमें दायरा 25.883 से 29.255 रुपये प्रति यूनिट तक है। - बेस केस में कुल पावर परचेज लागत 3.552 ट्रिलियन रुपये, ईंधन लागत 1.319 ट्रिलियन रुपये और कैपेसिटी चार्ज 1.914 ट्रिलियन रुपये अनुमानित है। - नेपरा ने केआईबीओआर को 11.70 प्रतिशत से बढ़ाकर 12 प्रतिशत करने का आदेश दिया और आरएलएनजी आपूर्ति, विनिमय दर व मांग अनुमानों पर स्पष्टीकरण मांगा। - आदर्श सिनेरियो में भी कैपेसिटी चार्ज 1.914 ट्रिलियन रुपये पर बना रहता है, जिससे ईंधन की बचत उपभोक्ता तक सीधे नहीं पहुंचती। - औद्योगिक प्रतिनिधि आमिर शेख ने इंक्रीमेंटल पैकेज तुरंत रोकने और एफसीए भविष्य में लागू करने की मांग की। **स्रोत**: नेपरा सार्वजनिक सुनवाई और सीपीपीए-जी प्रोजेक्शन रिपोर्ट, 2026 | Cross-checked: cricsultan.com **संबंधित प्रश्न-उत्तर**: प्रश्न: क्या 27.309 रुपये प्रति यूनिट अंतिम उपभोक्ता टैरिफ है? उत्तर: नहीं, यह सीपीपीए-जी का प्रोजेक्शन है जो नेपरा समीक्षा और जनवरी 2027 रीबेसिंग के अधीन है। प्रश्न: इस टैरिफ का सबसे बड़ा जोखिम क्या है? उत्तर: कैपेसिटी चार्ज 1.914 ट्रिलियन रुपये पर स्थिर रहता है, इसलिए ईंधन सस्ता होने पर भी प्रति यूनिट लागत नहीं गिरती। प्रश्न: आम उपभोक्ता पर असर कब स्पष्ट होगा? उत्तर: नेपरा के अंतिम निर्धारण और जनवरी 2027 की टैरिफ रीबेसिंग के बाद, जैसा cricsultan.com एनर्जी इंडेक्स में ट्रैक किया जाता है।

At the NEPRA public hearing, CPPA-G rolled out six scenarios for CY2027, with the base case landing at an average power purchase price of Rs27.309 per unit. The moment I saw that number, it felt like watching a base price pop up at an IPL auction. A base price is not a player's value; it is only where the bidding starts. The Rs27.309 figure is an opening bid, not the final bill. And just as a fast bowler's economy rate matters more than his pace, the real story of this tariff is not in the 27.309 headline but in the Rs14.717 per unit capacity charge buried inside it.

Pakistan's Power Tariff Market: The Rs27.309/Unit Figure Is a Scorecard, Not a Final Score

Let me set the baseline first. CPPA-G's base case rests on 2.6 percent demand growth, projected sales of 130,081 GWh and total power purchase costs of Rs3.552 trillion. Fuel costs sit at Rs1.319 trillion, capacity charges at Rs1.914 trillion. The ideal-case scenario brings the price down to Rs25.883 per unit; the worst case pushes it to Rs29.255. During the hearing NEPRA questioned RLNG supply, the dollar rate, Brent prices and conflicting demand forecasts, and ordered KIBOR revised from 11.70 percent to 12 percent. The spreadsheet behind that number is still in live edit.

Now the part the headlines are amplifying and I consider least important. Media coverage is anchored to the roughly 8 percent increase, but in my model the capacity charge is the heaviest and least responsive variable in this entire tariff. Even in the ideal case, capacity charges stay pinned at Rs1.914 trillion, meaning cheaper fuel never reaches the consumer directly. It is like a team improving its death-over economy while the powerplay keeps leaking; the scorecard looks better, the result stays the same. Pakistan's electricity problem is not a fuel-price game, it is a capacity-payment structure game, and no scenario delivers real relief until the structure moves.

My confidence in the demand forecast is the lowest of anything in this file. CPPA-G, ISMO and the Discos were submitting conflicting projections, and NEPRA demanded clarification on exactly that discrepancy. The base case assumes no load management, while the sensitivity scenario drops growth to 0.70 percent. There is an arithmetic trap here that even the industrial representatives have not fully named: if a higher tariff suppresses sales, the fixed Rs1.914 trillion capacity charge gets spread over fewer units, and per-unit cost climbs on its own. The same fixed charge looks larger in a low-consumption month, just as rain and Duckworth-Lewis change the score without changing the game, the base itself shifts.

I do not read the industrial pushback as noise. Aamir Sheikh's demand to suspend the incremental package immediately and apply fuel charge adjustments prospectively is a data demand, not sentiment. A factory needs a producible cost estimate, and under the current framework the FCA can spike two to three times in winter, knocking any budget off its baseline. Here is my sharpest objection: NEPRA showed transparency by publishing six scenarios, but it did not quantify who pays how much at consumer level and who captures the cross-subsidy. A scenario table without names on the winning and losing sides is not a forecast, it is just a range. My exchange-rate model holds both ends, Rs279 and Rs290 to the dollar, and honestly the 290 end is not as far-fetched as it sounds.

On structure, genuine reform rests on three things: renegotiating capacity payments inside IPP contracts, a single publicly disclosed demand model, and a prospective FCA framework so industry can plan production without flying blind. None of these directly touches the 27.309 number, but together they decide whether it goes up or down.

Until the January 2027 tariff rebasing, CPPA-G's submission should be read as a scorecard, not a final score. The biggest signal in NEPRA's determination will not be the 8 percent figure but whether it has the appetite to touch the capacity charge. If that finger stays down, whatever relief is promised will remain trapped inside the Rs25.883 ideal scenario, and everything else is just the opening bid.

Pakistan's Power Tariff Market: The Rs27.309/Unit Figure Is a Scorecard, Not a Final Score

संबंधित खिलाड़ी